Hire Writer If we claim and predicate that God Is eternal and that He exists, then he is not eternal. God again as Yellowstone points out that God cannot be redeeming without Him being changing in His variations of His states, any being that changes from one state to another is a being whose states there is temporal succession.
His argument Reason within the bounds of religion "that the religious beliefs of the Christian scholar ought to function as control beliefs within his devising and weighing of theories" p. Although I'm really curious WHY he believes these religious beliefs deserve the right to be control beliefs in the first place perhaps he is working und I know this book is just intended as an introduction to the the issue of Christian scholars in academia, but I really with Wolterstorff fleshed out how to use and modify control beliefs.
Although I'm really curious WHY he believes these religious beliefs deserve the right to be control beliefs in the first place perhaps he is working under the assumption that he needs to prove the veracity and reliability of religious beliefs?
What really throws me off though is a strong assertion he makes a few chapters later: My emphasis here is almost the opposite. He concludes at the end of the chapter that "The scholar never fully knows in advance where his line of thought will lead him. For the Christian to undertake scholarship is to undertake a course of action that may lead him into the painful process of revising his actual Christian commitment, sorting through his beliefs, and discardig some from a position where they can any longer function as control.
It may, indeed, even lead him to a point where his authentic commitment has undergone change. What principle can a religious scholar use for when to "hold" and when to "fold" certain religious convictions? I'm on board with revising religious ideas in light of scientific advancements, but this suggestion is simply unhelpful without adequate elaboration.
I know I'm spending a lot of energy on just a few quotes, but these points form the bedrock of some of the author's suggestions.
I'm sure that any scholar with religious convictions would find it interesting and challenging. In addition to some of the ideas about control beliefs in the first few chapters I really enjoyed Chapter 19 which explores the various beliefs about the value of learning and Chapter 20 which explores how a scholar should go about selecting an area of study.
Wolterstorff is a great example. This book is a learning experience in good philosophy that is eloquent as well as articulate; in advancing a position without an adversarial attitude a big challenge for me ; and in writing a book that is "real philosophy" but also perfectly relevant to and readable by non-philosophers.
That last point means the theory he's pushing isn't worked out in as much detail as it could be. On one hand, he does a grea I love finding philosophers who are also good writers. On one hand, he does a great job presenting it in less than pages. On the other hand, I'm not an expert in Wolterstorff or epistemology or anything at all really, so I don't know how to judge his position.
His thoughts on the interaction of faith and scholarship are very insightful and well-argued, but I don't see how they are specifically non-foundationalist insights. I was tempted to knock this down to three stars because I very much object to his reading of Aquinas in chapter Granted that Aquinas inherits a pagan and Islamic philosophical tradition that does tend toward intellectual elitism, it's pretty clear that he consciously rebels against that tendency.
He does it by working within the system he inherited, and maybe that's hopeless from the start, but he still tried to do it. Christians in academia In this little book, Wolterstorff presents a concise approach for how a Christian's core beliefs ought to relate to the "theory of theorizing".
The target audience is Christians in academic fields of study. He explains the reasons for the historical demise of foundationalism I found this to be a clear and helpful summary.
But he does not conclude that now "anything goes. This book gets going in an inter In this little book, Wolterstorff presents a concise approach for how a Christian's core beliefs ought to relate to the "theory of theorizing". This book gets going in an interesting direction, but I was left wondering where to go next.
Took that word from the preface, I like it In grand strokes, the book deals on how ones religion should comport with ones scholarly learning. Although as such it is written for those with learning as a profession, it still contains valuable points on how Christiann faith and science go together.
Feb 16, Jazz Salo rated it it was amazing A surprisingly good read. The tract size actually affords the ideas within more possibility for growth than that of larger titles. I guess I'm just perplexed that further work has not been done to expand on the many pregnant notions put forward in this deceptively unassuming text.
Nov 19, Dylan Bailey rated it liked it Good book but it will need to be read again. Some stuff went over my head but some was also very helpful and insightful. I enjoyed the authors bit on Christians pursing shalom in what ever context of culture and vocation that God has put them in.
Mar 13, Miriam Nard is currently reading it What a great little book. Feb 29, Larry rated it liked it brilliant, scholarly, biblical, great book, but not easy reading.that reason and understanding could provide any objective and empirical knowledge of things, and that all such knowledge was empirical and derived from experience; and to think otherwise was delusional.
This item: Reason within the Bounds of Religion (PBK) by Nicholas Wolterstorff Paperback $ Only 10 left in stock (more on the way). Ships from and sold by ph-vs.coms: 6.
His argument is "that the religious beliefs of the Christian scholar ought to function as control beliefs within his devising and weighing of theories" (p. 70)/5. Among quotations from Nicholas Wallflower's are: "That loss determines my identity; not all of my identity, but much of it.
It belongs within my story. I struggle indeed to go beyond merely owning my grief toward owning it redemptive. But I will not and cannot disown it. I shall remember Eric. Lament is part of life. His argument is "that the religious beliefs of the Christian scholar ought to function as control beliefs within his devising and weighing of theories" (p.
70)/5. Overview. Wolterstorff puts forward a proposal for a distinctly Christian approach to education, one that expands the teaching-learning process within the context of the covenant faith community.